Reducing the pop limit?

I’m giving strong consideration to the idea of dropping the Pop Character limit to 1,000 from 2,000. I’d like to explain my reasoning and give everyone a chance to weigh in prior to making a decision. At the end of the day, I need to make the decision that I believe best honors the integrity of what Clipmarks is all about, but I certainly don’t want to do that before hearing what our users have to say.

The reason we created Clipmarks was to give life to those wonderful bits of information that are buried within pages. I’m talking about the bits that literally make your brain come alive with interest, curiosity, bewilderment, passion, anger, hope, etc. They are the bits that you feel compelled to capture, comment on and immediately expose to other people.

Picture the offline act of reading a magazine or newspaper article and coming across something that so strongly grabs your attention that you immediately point it out to whoever is around you. You either blurt it out for others to hear or pass it along to someone, pointing to the specific piece of the page you want them to read. Well, our vision for Clipmarks is to create a global platform for that experience to occur in response to bits of “clipworthy” information people find on the web. Too many times I read a clip on the site and think that there is actually a clip within the clip that would have made a better clip…say that 10 times fast J

In my opinion, once a clip is too long, it’s impact as a unique form a content gets diluted. There is certainly no perfect size clip, but there is a size that, once exceeded, can no longer be considered a “clip”. We’re trying to find that fine line where the essence of a clip is honored, meaning is conveyed and an informed decision can be made by the reader about whether to click through to the source to read more. My gut is telling me that 2,000 characters is still too high.


5 responses to “Reducing the pop limit?

  1. I hate the pop limit. I think it should be completely removed.

    Short of that, I think it should be a user preference. If a user agrees with your vision, that only the bite-size stuff matters, then their pop/sort would only consider clips of appropriate size. Maybe the size itself could be user driven.

    Only the subject line determines if I’m going to click on a clip or not. If the subject line is interesting, I click it and read the clip. If the lenght of the clip is 500 or 50k bytes of text – why would that matter to me? All I see is the first few lines anyway, and I scroll to read the rest if I want to. If not, I move on. What is hard about this?

    I think the whole idea is wrong.

  2. No pop limits! Everything should be poppable!
    Make more tabs instead perhaps?
    “Latest Big Pops and “Latest Little Pops”.

  3. A vote for keeping things as they are (basically I’m a conservative) with the caveat that you are not getting heat from the content side.


  5. I think a trial run should be conducted with unlimited text characters. I think the clippers who call clipmarks home will appreciate the freedom allowed to them and will use their own discretion the best way possible. I like how Travi s put it above, and I think his statement reflects the habits of a majority of us. Thanks. Peace out.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s